A Model Critique is a protocol for quickly studying a high-quality piece of work and identifying the elements of quality that make it “work”.
In Continuous Improvement, you should use it when an improvement effort has identified an effective practice that they want to spread—especially if that practice may seem ambiguous, abstract, or complicated.
For example, if a school in an improvement network has developed an attendance letter that has proven effective at forging a warm connection with families of students at risk of becoming chronically absent, there are probably lots of schools in the network that would benefit from using their own modified version of this letter!
The improvement coaches could just send the email to the other schools as an attachment and hope for the best.
But the practice is more likely to spread if the improvement coaches conduct a model critique session so that everyone can identify the elements of the letter that make it effective. This will make it easier for everyone to adapt it to their own context, and therefore more likely that they will be adopted (and sustained).
The purpose of a “model critique” is threefold:
Any time a school in your network creates a tool or practice that you are hoping more schools in the network will adopt, this is a great opportunity for a model critique.
What to prepare in advance:
Figure out how to share the model:
1. Participants look at the model
2. Participants answer specific questions designed to draw attention to specific aspects of the model, in order to identify the specific qualities that make the model “good”.
Suggested questions for your first model critique:
3. Use the model to create a list of elements of high quality work that participants can use to assess their own versions.
4. Participants draw up a plan for introducing their version of the model in their own schools.